The last panel I did in the UK was with Pat Cadigan and Jaine Fenn at the Sf film fest in London, and it was about being women writers in a male dominated world. The message that, thank God, Pat got out in the first 5 minutes was how bored we are about constantly being stuck on panels where we talk about Our Struggle. Instead, IIRC, we talked about books we liked. I have done this 'women' panel in various forms about 5 times now and thank you, Judith, for not making me do another one at Eastercon. Pat and I are not 20 somethings who think feminists all wear dungarees: I hope Pat will correct me if I am wrong, but we both regard ourselves as feminists and in my case, a lot of my views come out of 1970s feminist theory.
Why is it still all about What the Guys Think? Some moron comes out with some reactionary statement on a blog no one reads and we all run about like there's a fox in the henhouse (derogatory metaphor is intentional). Why invest them with a power that they don't really have any more? I'm not that interested in what doesn't get said on Radio 4 - I've done a lot of BBC interviews, they're always cut to hell and you could bang on about female SF for hours and still end up with a 20 second sound bite about rocket ships.
A stack of novel-length editors in pro SF are women. Sheila Williams edits Asimov's, last time I looked, and Shawna edits fiction at ROF. A lot of agents are women. A lot of writers in SF and Fantasy are obviously female and I would contend that fantasy is now getting close to female dominated. I have sat on the InterZone editorial board - a magazine that gets a lot of flack for sexism. Along with the rest of the team, we turned down at least one story by one of the (male) greats of SF because we all felt it was just too tacky for the human eye to bear.
I have had one heartfelt email (sorry to do the 'lurkers support me in email' thing', but...) noting that, at the time of writing, relatively few people had addressed the point I made in the thread, which is not that professional female SF writers feel unsupported by the men, but that, a lot of the time, they feel unsupported by the women and that's actually more damaging. Invisibility, much?
The blokes have done a pretty good job in terms of personal support. Increasingly over a decade of pro writing, the lack of support and in one case, the overt hostility, that I've felt in my own career has been from female reviewers, critics and con com members. I've had a lot of support from fellow pros, both male and female, editing, agent and writing (naming and not shaming - Chris and Leigh Priest, Tanith Lee, Graham Joyce, Peter Lavery, Anne Groell, Storm Constantine, Rob Holdstock, Geoff Ryman, David Pringle, Gardner Dozois, Sheila Williams, Lisa Tuttle, Patricia Kennealy Morrison, Gwyneth Jones, Cheryl Morgan, Tricia Sullivan, Roz Kaveney, the Scheherazade team (female), Bidisha at the Guardian, my own agent Shawna, and I'm sure I have left some people out). And I will be guesting at Eastercon in 2010, for which, thank you, too.
I've had a lot of reviews from men, far less from women. I've subsequently heard from one of the former Wiscon con com, which I do appreciate (thank you), but this is pretty much the first time I've heard directly from anyone involved in Wiscon, Cheryl's efforts notwithstanding, in 10 years of writing what is described in the national press as feminist SF. Maybe they just think that what I write is shit, which is fair enough, if depressing. One of the most unpleasant online incidents I've had this year is with a feminist critic in the US, who took exception to my questioning her sacred right to write RP fanfic, and during Racefail launched into a quite remarkably unpleasant personal attack on a female friend of mine, then cited how proud she was of being 'not one of the nice girls'. With assholes like these - Jesus, give me dear old Brian Aldiss and his generational imperviousness to the girlies any day.
awake
bitchy